On Monday in this post I expressed all my doubts about the case Scazzi and I ventured a theory which unfortunately turned out to be exact:
Maybe Sarah is the poor been drawn in the box or taken to an isolated place, then I think it was strangled by two or more people, or while someone held her ... a mother took her to sneak behind
Tonight was stopped by Sarah's cousin, Sabrina Misseri, but only on the allegations of the father confessed. The motive, according to the statements of his father, would be the fight of the night before spring from Sarah to an older boy (Ivan) who was also interested in her cousin Sabrina.
Now, understanding that the situation is still not clear, I believe that this motive is not sufficient to justify a murder so cruel.
I think there is still something under. A
infatuation does not convince me. I think there is half the sex.
My theories at this point in this direction that ... Illuster (I apologize again with relatives of people that I will mention, I will not accuse anyone, I'm just trying to make certain assumptions, also because not personally know the people involved)
1) Sarah had a secret history with Ivan, which included sexual history between the two. At this point, the fierce jealousy of Sabrina would make sense.
2) Sarah had revealed the intentions of morbid Michele Misseri her daughter Sabrina, and so has set a trap for a face to face confrontation that resulted in tragedy.
3) Sabrina and her father had an incestuous relationship, a relationship which she had to be enlarged to include Sarah, who was pulled back and she was killed for not disclosing the terrible secret.
Now it is difficult to think that Sabrina had already decided to kill Sarah also because the two had an appointment with a third friend (Marie) who would arrive at 14:30.
E 'unlikely architects thought about someone committing a murder by programming in a hole of 10-15 minutes ... Sabrina had made an appointment, or just in Mariangela quell'orario to have a solid alibi?
In all this there are still two bizarre element: why Misseri has confessed to the act of necrophilia on the corpse of poor Sarah and why she kept the phone?
It was more logical to keep for himself this gruesome violence and throw the phone in the same trench where he had hidden the body? Perhaps
Misseri invented everything ... and only sought di peggiorare la sua situazione per evitare che gli inquirenti indagassero in altre direzioni, magari sperando che il pensiero comune fosse.... "se questo qui confessa di aver violentato un cadavere allora è capace di tutto e quindi è stato per forza lui ad ucciderla".
Forse Misseri stesso da piccolo aveva subito violenza dal padre nello stesso luogo (sotto l'albero di fico) e in un certo senso si è voluto liberare di quella violenza perpetuando a sua volta una violenza verso un'indifesa.
Forse Misseri nel periodo in cui aveva lavorato in un cimitero in Germania aveva provato attrazione verso i cadaveri.
Forse Misseri aveva sentito delle voci sulle strane frequentazioni di Sarah e ha fantasticato tutto il tempo su come sarebbe stato avere sex with an underage girl, and wanted to try it even in death. Perhaps
Misseri has kept the phone as a fetish ... and then won by rimosrso
tried to leave him around because he could no longer live in peace.
Maybe your phone does not Misseri had it when he went to the well.
Maybe the phone there were clear evidence that they also resisted the well water and so has not dropped immediately but tried to set him on fire (did not succeed in distuggerlo).
Maybe there were clues on the phone in a way that could exonerate
Misseri and therefore thought to conservarselo if someone had threatened or discovered?
What is the truth?
0 comments:
Post a Comment